# Improving integration filtering

**URL:** <https://community.gladysassistant.com/t/ameliorer-le-filtrage-des-integrations/10577>\
**Category:** Demande de fonctionnalités\
**Created:** [August 15, 2026, 3:06pm UTC](https://community.gladysassistant.com/t/ameliorer-le-filtrage-des-integrations/10577 "2026-08-15T15:06:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![StephaneB](https://gladys-assistant-community.b-cdn.net/user_avatar/community.gladysassistant.com/stephaneb/32/15443_2.png) [@StephaneB](https://community.gladysassistant.com/u/StephaneB)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2026, 3:06pm UTC](https://community.gladysassistant.com/t/ameliorer-le-filtrage-des-integrations/10577/1 "2026-08-15T15:06:54Z")

</div>

Today, on the page listing integrations, there are two filtering mechanisms: categories (which allow only one choice at a time) and tags (which are combined with a logical AND if multiple are selected).  
I suggest 3 improvements:

- move the ‹&nbsp;favorites&nbsp;› choice to make it a tag rather than a category. This will allow filtering, for example, integrations in the ‹&nbsp;energy&nbsp;› category and marked as ‹&nbsp;favorites&nbsp;›, or filtering integrations that have both the ‹&nbsp;favorites&nbsp;› and ‹&nbsp;community&nbsp;› and ‹&nbsp;local&nbsp;› tags.
- add two tags ‹&nbsp;installed&nbsp;› and ‹&nbsp;not installed&nbsp;›
- add two tags ‹&nbsp;new&nbsp;› and ‹&nbsp;soon deprecated&nbsp;›