Thanks a lot
. Same steps and itâs back .. I can breathe again ![]()
I also cleared the cache just in case. Thanks ![]()
Now Iâm going to enjoy myself .. ![]()
Thanks a lot
. Same steps and itâs back .. I can breathe again ![]()
I also cleared the cache just in case. Thanks ![]()
Now Iâm going to enjoy myself .. ![]()
I discovered version 5 and Iâm amazed! I entered the world of Gladys in early June 2026 with the starter kit, and in just 3 months Iâm already witnessing a truly beautiful overhaul: the modern and pleasant design makes you want to use it, all the improvements I wished for to make it simpler and easier to use are now here. Plus, all these new integrations allow you to go even further in terms of possibilities. Itâs incredible, and I really congratulate @pierre-gilles and the other contributors (and the expensive Claude too) for responding so quickly to our expectations: what a job and leap made in this August 2026, thank you so much!
Oh, no, really. I want a popup
.
Iâm kidding, of course. The design is nice and everything is there. The idea of the popup is to avoid overloading the dashboard.
The problem is that now that GA is moving at high speed, weâre going to become more and more demanding ![]()
I canât keep up. Itâs going too fast for me (Iâm going back to HA, itâs slower
)
But seriously, do you guys never sleep?
Joking aside: itâs getting better than HA but without touching YAML.
This new version is really great! ![]()
Thanks to @pierre-gilles and all the contributors ![]()
![]()
Thanks for this new version!
Users since v3, so many beautiful evolutions have taken place and I donât regret my choice of Gladys ![]()
I even recently published my first external integration haha
The new interface is great, but I have a few small suggestions/improvements, especially on mobile.
The first, the most annoying, is that the dashboard menu does not display in a readable way on mobile.
When in portrait format and with numerical settings with a comma, you canât see the full values which are partially hidden by the + and - buttons.
And this one which is much more a personal opinion than a functional problem ![]()
The color features appeared before as a colored rectangle, but now itâs just the color of the light icon that changes.
I find it less visible than before.
In cases where we use the color features on custom modules that donât have lighting but the color serves as a status indicator, then itâs no longer possible to see the color without clicking on the switch arrow.
I saw that I could change my on/off switches to on/off lights to fix the color display issue.
But I think it would be nice to be able to choose whether you want to display the color alone or associated with a button/light.
I notably used the colored rectangles as a visual signal to tell me if something is okay or not, now itâs less obvious.
But there you go, after all itâs just me and my tinkering that deviate from the basic use. ![]()
Thanks for the feedback, I sent an email to all Gladys Plus users to remind them to update their local instance!
For future versions, Iâll think of a mechanism to make it clearer in the interface that the two (Gladys Plus and the local instance) are not at the same version ![]()
![]()
Itâs very nice @Chris75, thank you for trusting Gladys for your home automation project, and thank you for your financial support which made these developments possible ![]()
Thatâs the goal ![]()
Thank you @Checconio ![]()
I will look at your feedback point by point, especially the bug of the dashboard menu which is off-screen, it will be fixed during the day!
A huge thank you for all the work done over the years on Gladys.
This new version is impressively mature, and the recent developments with AI and External Integrations are simply amazing.
A VERY VERY big thank you to Pierre Gilles and ALL THE CONTRIBUTORS
This v5 brings real functional changes, and a visual âč freshness âș that feels great. A big bravo!!
After a little scare
being away from my home.
Thank you for all the work done.
This new version is impressive.
Recent developments with AI and External Integrations are simply fantastic.
Having started in Home Automation more than 4 years ago with Gladys, I really donât regret this choice. ![]()
Bravo to everyone!!
For my part, Iâm not a fan of the new dashboard.
What bothers me the most are all the truncated sentences.
You have to switch to a single-column section, copy the device reference, go down to the new location, create a new device, paste the reference, then go back up and delete the first one.
In short, itâs extremely time-consuming.
@bjm the truncated names are fixed in 5.0.2 which just came out ![]()
I donât know if anyone was on the live stream last night, but I spent 2 hours and 30 minutes talking about Gladys with Aymeric from the Aylabs channel:
It was fascinating; we talked about Gladys Assistant 5, external integrations, and the AI-assisted development process that has allowed Gladys to progress so quickly over the past few months ![]()
Yes, I saw the live stream.
You had several questions about the mobile app. This could be the gateway for Gladys to become a Thread border router. Could we use the mobileâs Bluetooth and camera to pair Matter devices over Thread? No, what do you think?
I havenât done any testing, but from my discussions with Claude and my research, the cleanest and most stable implementation would be Bluetooth pairing directly from Gladys, whereas Bluetooth on mobile seems very complicated.
The main reason: on mobile, you donât control the stack. On Android, Thread credentials are stored in Google Play Services and not in the app, Googleâs Matter UI takes over during pairing, and you need the Location permission set to « Always Allow » or it fails silently. On iOS, you have to go through Appleâs framework. This means a different experience on each phone, and a dependency on Google and Apple that I prefer to avoid. On the server side, on the other hand, the Bluetooth stack is always the same, itâs already present in Gladys, and I can test and debug it.
Home Assistant made exactly this move in 2026.6 and now allows pairing Matter without a phone, via their own Bluetooth stack. And their new implementation is in JavaScript (matterjs-server, based on matter.js, like Gladys).
For the QR code, you donât need a native app either: a browser can scan a QR code.
I confirm that itâs better to use the deviceâs BLE rather than the phoneâs.
Iâm on GrapheneOS and I canât pair Matter via my smartphone (same on /e/OS and IodeOS or any other custom ROMs).
As you said, HA has backtracked by allowing pairing via its HA Proxy BLE network.
Iâm not the only one having Matter product pairing issues. Iâm on /e/os. Now I understand why.
Hi, and yes via smartphone itâs Google Services that manages the encrypted connection with the devices as far as I understand. So, by going through MicroG it doesnât work but same with GrapheneOS which actually uses Google Services but since itâs not full access it doesnât work.
I just reinstalled Gladys, and I wanted to thank everyone who is participating and has participated in the project. V5 is a real pleasure.
Congratulations, itâs so much better, and yet identical.
I appreciate the attention to detail you have.