Feature description
On the Integrations page, classify or indicate via a logo/label the integrations usable only with Gladys Plus (such as Google Home, OpenAI GPT-3, …)
Why not a logo / label, yes!
And the one that goes through the cloud (third party) would be nice too.
2 Likes
So rather a tagging system! I agree 
4 Likes
Very good idea, especially to point out what isn’t « local only » and uses external APIs.
it would be great to have this tagging system on integrations for lots of things, I think :
- Gladys Plus
- Cloud (third-party)
- Favorites (with the ability to filter by default on favorite integrations)
- Used (to see if it would actually be useful)
2 Likes
This kind of approach, which would allow filtering by tag, seems good and could even be generalized to many views (scenes or the device list in integrations)
4 Likes
Following the course of the discussion, I’m adding the following thread which requested the addition of a « My integrations » section:
@cicoub13, I don’t know if this is justified but in this particular case, perhaps you could change the title to take the request in a broader sense? A ‹ Tag ›-type development could be implemented for a set of themes.
I changed the title to highlight the concept of tags. If this feature is developed and successful, we could consider rolling it out to other pages 
3 Likes
Maybe sort (or hide) integrations based on their usage in services, for example I have disabled the services I don’t use
or simply add an « Enabled integrations » filter under the « All integrations » filter
I’m reopening the discussion.
There are more and more integrations and, with tags, it would be good to add categories.
like:
- Lights
– Philips Hue - Climate
– Mitsubishi - Sound
– Sonos
2 Likes
I just created a page with TAGs / Categories for integrations.
Feel free to give feedback, I don’t use all the integrations.
We can add terms.
The idea would be to also use these TAGs / categories on the Glad
2 Likes
I think this feature is very interesting (even essential) to make it easier to realise what is local or not.
However, and this is only my opinion, I might not go as far as putting everything that can be controlled with it into tags like light, remote control, etc., or else present them with a different visual
-
Tags related to the use of the integration (Cloud, GladysPlus, Locale)
-
Functional tags (light, remote control, presence, etc
I’m following up on this request because I find that the add-ons lack information indicating whether it’s cloud-based, whether Gladys Plus is required, etc.
I think it’s just visual?
6 Likes
Are we going with a “menu on the left” approach with 3 new categories, like this?
Or rather a heavier system of tags on each integration + filters.
3 Likes
I would have gone for a small cloud icon for cloud, a G+ for Gladys Plus, for example. In the plugin tile as a visual.
Also, filtering on the side is a plus as well.
Personally, I prefer that, yes.
Here is the final rendering (colors and icons modifiable)
Questions:
- for integrations that may be Gladys Plus or not (like energy monitoring), should I add the tag?
- for integrations that may be Cloud or not (like Nuki), should I add the tag?
I would have said another tag « local/cloud ».
We’ll also have Netatmo (which has cloud devices and other local ones), and soon Tuya (currently cloud-only)