Great job everyone for the work!!
I have a few remarks after watching the video:
-
You suggested it quickly @pierre-gilles, but indeed I think we could consider changing the label of the MQTT integration to « Virtual devices », in any case a way to make this part more understandable and accessible. Quite a few people request features on the forum that are actually already possible thanks to these fake devices… maybe we should highlight that more.
-
I also think within the same integration we need to rethink this: Catalogue des features supportées en MQTT
Because as you showed with the risk level feature, I can’t guess that this feature expects a minimum value of 0 and a maximum of 3 … Unless I do specific research. I think this info should be available from the interface.
My 2 cents ! ![]()