@pierre-gilles To add my two cents to the discussion: I, too, hesitated quite a bit before subscribing to Gladys Plus because of a single all-inclusive price (at the time, you only had one rate, if I remember correctly). Basically my reasoning was âsince Iâm not interested in everything, why should I pay for everything?â, without even really asking myself the value of each offered feature.
Today I know that what I use is well worth what I pay, but Iâd say that the way you present your offer can create a barrier.
That said, you obviously couldnât afford a complicated pricing scheme. But maybe one option would be to say that each individual feature costs âŹ2/month. And that the full Gladys Plus is âŹ9.99/month. And no more need to manage a âliteâ pack where you might have tried to guess what would interest people who donât want everythingâŠ
Lâavantage pour les utilisateurs :
no more âpsychologicalâ barrier to try Gladys Plus
An âĂ la carteâ offer that everyone can manage
A favorable price as soon as 5 features or more interest you
Lâavantage pour toi :
more new Gladys Plus customers
An offer thatâs simple to explain
An understanding of what truly attracts people when they choose âĂ la carteâ
But itâs probably technically not so simple to implementâŠ
For my part, Iâm wondering why offer different mini PCs?
Since they will be delivered preinstalled, the user wonât use this PC for anything else. So for me, we should offer a PC that runs Gladys well, one that wonât experience slowdowns, but nothing more. Why pay more for a mini PC of which weâd only use 50% of the capacity. I canât say which is the most suitable, I havenât run the tests and Iâm certainly not the best person to do them: but if the T5 does the job, Iâd go with that. If itâs too tight, then go with the S12 which we already know works.
And if itâs the T5, that allows you to offer a preinstalled box for under âŹ150 (even giving yourself a margin for the time spent, which wouldnât be unreasonable). I find that very reasonable and competitive, it seems to me.
If itâs the S12, you can also give yourself a margin, but in my view it should stay below âŹ200.
Thatâs just my opinion, but since youâre asking us, Iâm giving it .
Iâd be curious to know whether other companies have successfully implemented this kind of strategy, because itâs still very, very complicated
With 7 features in Gladys Plus, thatâs 2^7 - 1 = 127 combinations
Even Home Assistant, which has many more users than Gladys, only offers a single plan at âŹ7.50/month, and yet you could say that with their size they would have even more need to segment their offer, and yet they donât!
Thanks for your opinion!
Gladysâ resource usage depends a lot on each userâs configuration. Itâs not at all the same to have 2 connected devices or an installation with 100 devices and multiple cameras, for example.
Thatâs why I propose different models: everyone can choose the mini-PC best suited to their âtargetâ usage.
Moreover, many users see their installation as a long-term investment. Their home automation is meant to last several years, so some prefer to opt for a slightly more powerful machine, ready for the future and for possible more demanding features.
The Beelink T5 option is aimed at users on a tight budget who want to start small while keeping a solid base.
On the competitor side, Home Assistant offers for example the Home Assistant Green at âŹ109 (excluding shipping).
Itâs an even more entry-level machine than the Beelink T5: 32 GB of storage versus 64 GB, and a RK3566 processor that is significantly less powerful than the Intel N4020 of the T5.
Do you need to worry about all possible combinations? I had in mind a checklist when you subscribe to Gladys Plus âĂ la carteâ. And the only thing that matters for handling billing is the number of checked features, no matter which onesâŠ
@pierre-gilles doesnât mention it, but if Iâm not mistaken, you can absolutely use the pre-installed mini PC for any other purpose. Itâs not a Gladys OS. Itâs a Linux with Gladys pre-installed.
I donât know if it was successful but Jeedom offers paid official plugins and an expensive service pack. If I recall I paid âŹ85 for the service pack which then allowed me to access all the paid plugins even if I didnât use them all.
I am a Gladys Plus user (and training) and yet I donât use the Enedis part because Iâm in Alsace and we donât have Enedis. What matters to me is being able to connect remotely, thatâs all. Of course I could have set up a VPN server, installed the clients on all my devices, but I prefer to support the project this way.
Jeedom boxes start at âŹ200 with integrated protocols. If you go cheap, you can get a Lidl box for less than âŹ30; on the other hand you can get a Homey Pro at âŹ350. Both offer basic Zigbee and Wi-Fi.
What will make the difference will be the software, ease of use, the all-in-one.
If I have to pay for something, itâs to have a product ready to use.
I therefore agree with @StephaneBâs idea to offer plug-ins individually and have a bundle, and also agree with @bab85 to have just one machine (from my personal experience: 4 cores, 8 GB DDR4, 256 GB NVMe, Wi-Fi, Zigbee)
The main question is : who is your target?
If itâs tinkerers, theyâll have their gear.
If theyâre novices then youâll have to give them only one solution otherwise youâll lose them.
If you want to do « mass » sales to otherwise increase your revenue then youâll need to go through a partner shop to get (much) more visibility (Domadoo?).
Everything you propose in hardware and service is great for technical people, not for novices.
Well I could discuss at length because Iâm passionate about this topic (probably my experience as a product manager), but at some point youâll have to define that target; the sooner the better for future decisions.
One point I disagree with you on is making installation and logistics management free, selling at cost. You need to value it. Selling at cost will in any case always be too expensive for those who cannot/will not pay for a quality product and services.
Iâve always been told that anything thatâs free has no value, and that all work deserves to be paid.
(Sorry to be so long but Iâm very interested in the project and I think it has a lot of potential)
In a sense, yes, because you need to be able to test the « dependencies » between options.
For example, currently, you canât configure Enedis without the « remote access » part of Gladys Plus. So, if we made Enedis optional, weâd need to test the « Enedis alone » combination.
There are dozens of things to manage: the user may subscribe to remote access on Monday, realize on Tuesday that they also want backup, and on Wednesday Enedis.
Either I do pro-rata subscription calculations, or they end up with 3 subscriptions but with separate billing cycles.
Not to mention that micropayments with the current banking system are not profitable (because there are fixed transaction fees), so âŹ2 options could only be offered annuallyâŠ
The more I list it out, the more I tell myself that if no one does this, thereâs a reason
Exactly, I just plan to offer a mini-PC that will be installed in the same way as described in the training: Ubuntu + Gladys installed via Docker.
I will provide randomly generated « username/password » credentials for the Linux user account, and the user will be able, if they want, to change anything on the instance
Jeedom isnât doing very well actually and in my opinion thatâs also due to their positioning.
(And to their aging product, but thatâs another topic)
Exactly! Iâd be curious to know if Homey Pro manages to break into the French market with those prices, and how they manage to attract their audience.
The target here is a tech-savvy but not expert user, who has an appetite for the Linux world but is a bit « lazy » to do the full installation.
When competitors offer plug \u0026 play boxes, they wonder why they should do things themselves like flashing a USB stick, installing Linux, installing Docker, installing Gladys, etc., with all the risks of « that they wonât be able to do it. »
My theory is that a large part of purchasing psychology would be unlocked with these pre-installed mini-PCs. After all, as always in entrepreneurship, the only way to know is to test
I understand your point, but for me, the selling price is the meeting point between what the user is willing to pay and what Iâm willing to sell it for.
The production cost ultimately only has an indirect link to the final price.
If my cost is too high and I decide to sell at that level, I will only reach a small part of the market: those willing to pay that price.
Conversely, lowering the price expands the user base, which can be more interesting strategically.
I have always seen the starter kit as a loss leader, which then allows offering Gladys Plus, the only truly profitable offering that keeps the project alive.
When I launched the starter kit, sales were good the first year (28 kits in 12 months), but theyâve tapered off since April.
So Iâm trying to understand what changed and evolve the offering until I regain a good momentum
No, the idea isnât to do mass sales.
The long-term goal is to have between 600 and 1000 paying Gladys Plus users; thatâs the « minimum » threshold for me to be able to work on Gladys full-time. Weâre at 95 currently.
I misspoke, I was talking about Gladysâ target audience, not the mini PCs.
When I started in home automation, I bought a Zipabox because it was all-in-one: a nice, compact hub, an integrated Z-Wave module (nothing else to buy), an iOS app (free and dedicated), and a simple, pleasant-to-use interface. In short, nothing to do except plug in the box.
Gladys already delivers ease of use and a very nice UI; it just needs a ready-to-use box and a protocol provided with a dongle (Zigbee at first even if Matter will become the central point).
It may not be a product for right now, but I can definitely see it for later.
A small thought that crosses my mind as I write these lines.
If you offer a single all-in-one product, a non-cloud solution, compatible with a radio protocol and above all compatible with Matter, with 6 months of Gladys Plus (I find 1 year too long, personal opinion, for a visible ROI sooner) and 6 months of training (I donât know if thatâs possible), you could reach a lot of home automation, tech and mini-PC sites/blogs with a new offer that finally democratizes Gladys Assistant.
I think the feedback could be really good and that those who are on an old Jeedom, a Home Assistant (HA) thatâs a bit too complex, or other aging (or more expensive) solutions.
Checking with Perplexity, there arenât many articles about Gladys and Matter:
Looking into it a bit, I discovered there are third-party insurance options cheaper than the insurance offered by default on these platforms â Iâm digging deeper!
I donât know if Iâm going to move things forward because I donât have any delivery expertise, but why not let the buyer take charge? More and more online shops let the buyer choose the delivery method and itâs up to them to decide how much they want to pay. Of course, you have to be clear about the services associated with each type of delivery (notably insurance), but I think everyone should take responsibility and decide whether they prefer to pay more for insurance or pay less with a risk of not being delivered. I know that if a buyer isnât delivered, their first reflex will be to turn on the seller, but, well, at some point you have to stop catering to people. Okay, maybe thatâs a bit of an extreme reaction, but I find that weâre assisting people more and more when, on the contrary, we should be making them responsible (maybe Iâm straying from the topic). In the end, I would offer several delivery options and make the buyer bear the cost.
If a customer orders a product online, they should not be held responsible for a subcontractorâs negligence and it is not up to them to bear the loss of a package.
It is even illegal under French law according to my research:
This is not about enabling people, on the contrary itâs about protecting them from abusive sellers on the internet.
In any case, regardless of the insurance I take out, I will directly reship another mini-PC in the event of a package loss, with no extra charge to the end user. That seems rather obvious to me
The basic coverage applies based on the declared weight of the parcel; generally itâs not much.
With what we were selling, we were around 20 kg per parcel and we never took out additional insurance because the coverage (I donât remember how many euros per kilo, it depends on the carrier) covered our production costs (and we had one dispute that was refunded).
Youâd need to check exactly what the carrier reimburses per kg.
Sorry if I shocked you, but what I meant is that the buyer must also take their share of responsibility and agree to pay the insurance associated with delivery.
The difficulty is finding the right balance between a solution that allows you to protect yourself and not lose money and a delivery cost that the buyer can reasonably bear. But here, I donât have enough expertise in the matter to be of any help to you. Sorry.
in the same way you have a sentence that highlights the training, you could have one that highlights delivery (to underline that you chose a guaranteed shipping method and that the user takes no risk), the labor (to underline that with this, the user will have nothing to do, they will receive equipment ready to operate), and maybe also the mini PC (to underline that it is perfectly suited to this or that use)
You explicitly state the ââŹ99.99 per year thereafterâ. But I assume there will be the possibility to unsubscribe from Gladys plus at the end of the first 6 months, and that you are counting on the 6-month trial to convince people to keep this service. So it would seem better to present that as an option so it doesnât give the user the impression that they will be obliged. For example ââŹ99.99 per year thereafter to keep Gladys plusâ
⊠and add two compatible outlets (WiFi, ZigBee + dongle, Matter?)
At first, that was my problem. I didnât know, didnât understand the protocols, etc. So I was afraid to buy things and have them not work (or not work well), of not having the right antenna, router
But be careful, price is not the only criterion for choosing a home automation solution.
Personally, I discovered home automation with an eedomus box (a very good box for starting out, by the way) but I quickly discovered the complexity of the protocols (EnOcean, Zigbee, Z-Wave âŠ) and the multiplicity of available devices.
I then wanted to integrate the various devices I had (Philips Hue bulbs, Nodon smart plug, Airzone air conditioning âŠ.) and I quickly realized that home automation was far from being as accessible as people like to say.
The idea of providing dongles for the most common protocols seems like a good idea to me. Even if that increases the price, I think people will prefer to have « plug-and-play ».
.
