[Matter] Add PM10 management

[pierre-gilles]

Description

Manage PM10 sensors in the Matter integration

[mutmut]

[Nagromdark]

Hi,

I opened a PR:

Matter: Add PM10 sensors

I have a question: for now in Gladys we have 3 color levels, namely: good, average, bad.
Would it be good to use the scale posted previously with 6 colors or not?

[mutmut]

Hi @Nagromdark and thanks for the PR!
for the PM2.5 that @pierre-gilles had added, the color level (base 3) is not consistent with what I had on the Dyson app.
According to Perplexity, here are the different tiers of the ATMO thresholds (which do not necessarily correspond to the Dyson scale except maybe if divided by 5 or 10) :

After a few questions to Perplexity, it’s better to base ourselves on the ATMO values :

[pierre-gilles]

Thanks for the PR @Nagromdark
Did you test that it works?

@Nagromdark

I have a question: for the moment in Gladys we have 3 color levels, namely: good, medium, bad.

I don’t really have an opinion, we can

[Nagromdark]

Thanks @mutmut for this data,

OK we’ll stick to 3 levels for now, I suggest for PM10 :

• Good < 30
• Moderate < 50
• Poor >= 50

For PM2.5 this seems better to me :

• Good < 15
• Moderate < 25
• Poor >= 25

@pierre-gilles

Thanks for the PR @Nagromdark
Did you test that it works?

Yes I tested locally that it works, I can take screenshots here as soon

[pierre-gilles]

@Nagromdark

Yes, I did test locally that it worked,

Which Matter device did you test with?

@Nagromdark

OK we’ll stick with 3 levels for now, I propose for PM10:

• Good < 30
• Moderate < 50
• Poor >= 50

That seems pretty good

@Nagromdark

For PM2.5 that seems better:

• Good < 15
• Moderate < 25
• Poor >= 25

That seems better, borderline the « Good » could be <= 10 from what I find, but that might be too strict.

I’m fine with you making the change in another PR though

[Nagromdark]

OK I’ll make a separate PR for PM2.5

For PM10, I therefore need to

[Nagromdark]

Change values of colorLowAsGreen for PM2.5 sensor

[pierre-gilles]

@Nagromdark

So for PM10, I therefore have to change the values but I can’t do it in the PR already open as far as I understand?

Yes, you can for PM10, I was talking about PM2.5

@Nagromdark

For tests I have a Dyson TP10 tower, connected to matterbridge. Well, matterbridge is acting up

So, was it working at least a little or did you fail to test the value reporting?
At worst, you can use Matterbridge with the example plugin: GitHub - Luligu/matterbridge-example-dynamic-platform: Matterbridge dynamic platform plugin example

which sends random values at regular intervals, it allows you to run tests very easily

[pierre-gilles]

I’ve merged your PR for the PM2.5 change, thanks again for the PR

I’ve added you to the README as a contributor, congrats on your first contribution @Nagromdark

[Nagromdark]

Thanks @pierre-gilles ,

yes I was able to test PM10, the values are coming through fine in Gladys. Thanks for the test plugin, nevertheless it seems to have a few small bugs in this plugin :

Anyway, I can see the reading on the right

[pierre-gilles]

Ok, in that case that sounds good to me

I’ll rebase onto master to resolve the conflicts and then I’ll merge!

Thanks for your contribution!

[pierre-gilles]

It’s merged, it will be included in the next Gladys release

[pierre-gilles]

It’s available in Gladys Assistant 4.62:

Gladys Assistant 4.62 : Mise à jour de Zigbee2mqtt & PM10 dans Matter

Salut à tous J’espère que vous avez passé un excellent été ! Aujourd’hui, je suis ravi de vous annoncer la sortie de Gladys Assistant 4.62, qui apporte deux belles nouveautés : Mise à jour de Zigbee2MQTT Pour tous ceux qui utilisent Zigbee2MQTT intégré à Gladys, la version embarquée passe désormais en 2.6.1. Cette mise à jour apporte de nombreuses nouvelles compatibilités d’appareils Le changelog complet est disponible ici. J’a…

Thanks for your contribution