I suppose the command was rather to be done in the nodered flow to have the configuration of the old system. I don’t realize what is the simplest:
I re-paired one of my shutters, and the re-pairing went well. However, it does not respond to the commands sent and does not create a new remote control. The same happens if I use a command that I use in Node-RED and that works. The only devices created are those when using the physical remote controls.
Gosh, do you have information in the logs (integration and gladys)?
RFlink accepts pairing, the shutter goes up and down when you put it in prog and goes up and down when it validates the pairing. You can see the pairing in the logs and the sending of the test command.
[2026-08-16T14:20:58.590Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;AE;RTS;ID=26d460;SWITCH=01;CMD=STOP;
[2026-08-16T14:20:58.866Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;AF;Debug;RTS P1;a38710f326d460;
[2026-08-16T14:20:58.869Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;B0;RTS;ID=26d460;SWITCH=01;CMD=STOP;
[2026-08-16T14:20:59.644Z] [INFO] [actions] Action send_command -> 10;RTS;A00001;0;PAIR;
[2026-08-16T14:21:02.894Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;B1;OK;
[2026-08-16T14:21:23.715Z] [INFO] [actions] Action send_command -> 10;RTS;A00001;0;DOWN;
[2026-08-16T14:21:26.987Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;B2;OK;
[2026-08-16T14:21:36.822Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;B3;PONG;
[2026-08-16T14:22:14.070Z] [INFO] [pipeline] Replaying the last known reading of ext:ext-philippema-gladys-rflink:rts:26d460-01
[2026-08-16T14:22:29.389Z] [INFO] [pipeline] Replaying the last known reading of ext:ext-philippema-gladys-
But when I do 10;RTSSHOW; there is no new pairing in RFlink. The new pairing is not in RFlink.
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.138Z] [INFO] [actions] Action send_command -> 10;RTSSHOW;
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.168Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 0 Address: FFFFFF RC: FFFF
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.174Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 1 Address: F00010 RC: 0EDF
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.179Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 2 Address: F00020 RC: 0A9B
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.185Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 3 Address: F00030 RC: 0501
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.196Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 4 Address: F00040 RC: 0B6C
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.201Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 5 Address: F00050 RC: 0007
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.207Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 6 Address: F00060 RC: 041F
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.212Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 7 Address: F00070 RC: 064B
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.223Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 8 Address: F00080 RC: 032C
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.228Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 9 Address: FFFFFF RC: FFFF
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.234Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 10 Address: FFFFFF RC: FFFF
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.245Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 11 Address: FFFFFF RC: FFFF
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.250Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 12 Address: FFFFFF RC: FFFF
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.256Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 13 Address: FFFFFF RC: FFFF
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.261Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 14 Address: FFFFFF RC: FFFF
[2026-08-16T14:51:27.270Z] [INFO] RFLink <- RTS Record: 15 Address: FFFFFF RC: FFFF
Addresses 1 to 8 are the ones configured for my Node-RED flow.
Have you tried sending a new command:
10;RTS;A00001;0;UP;
And then immediately go to the discovery section. If you still don’t have the shutter, there must be something wrong. Do you have automatic discovery enabled in the configuration? If yes, and still no discovered shutter, I’ll escalate the issue to Claude. I’d like the integration logs 
Thanks for your patience, we’ll get there.
yes several times. automatic discovery is checked and a new device is created every time I use a physical remote control.
[2026-08-16T15:46:34.716Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;3B;PONG;
[2026-08-16T15:46:57.418Z] [INFO] [actions] Action send_command -> 10;RTS;A00001;0;UP;
[2026-08-16T15:47:00.657Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;3C;OK;
[2026-08-16T15:47:34.719Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;3D;PONG;
[2026-08-16T15:48:34.751Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;3E;PONG;
[2026-08-16T15:49:34.728Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;3F;PONG;
[2026-08-16T15:50:34.709Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;40;PONG;
[2026-08-16T15:51:34.729Z] [INFO] RFLink <- 20;41;PONG;
Okay, I’ll run Claude on the analysis.