I love this development!! But I admit it’s a time sink for viewing…^^ And then when you start displaying all your devices and seeing where you could save 
Just to compare ^^
What reassures me at home is that it’s the professional one that consumes a lot ^^
Tough break … and it always happens at the worst time!!
The dream 
Bring out the BBQ to heat with wood/charcoal and enjoy grilling a few merguez at the same time. Watch out, it leaves marks in the room 
Oh but this update is so cool, I totally didn’t see it come out 
I only encountered 2 difficulties :
In any case I’m really going to love it when it works
Okay, I know I’ve been publishing a lot of updates this weekend, but it’s to improve Gladys for everyone 
I just released Gladys Assistant v4.66.5, which fixes two issues:
After the update, I did see this new magic button appear 
. And after the fix, all my devices are
In your screenshot, the 30-minute consumption is well placed!
Hello,
Thanks for all
That’s perfect @prohand 
Thanks
FYI my RAM after the update :
oh, lucky you! 
Well, Houston, we’ve got a problem… I don’t agree…
A consumption cannot be ‹ under › a cost; that doesn’t make sense and it’s not real.
That’s why I was against having the visuals « Consumption 30 minutes » and « Cost 30 minutes » directly here. They are « values » intrinsically linked because of this development. But they only depend on their original physical meter.
In your example @prohand the Lixee device should be directly under the Enedis device. And the Socket device directly under the Lixee device. Then each has its own consumption and its cost linked to its consumption. Then it’s the integration that should deduce that each 30-minute consumption is linked to the hierarchy above and the same for costs. But it’s wrong to say that the Lixee device is directly linked to Enedis’s 30-minute cost…
Yes that’s true, you’re right 
I was saying it was perfect since, in itself, it wouldn’t change anything about the current state of development
Is it better like this, right? :
I’d like it to be perfect for future development
I saw that I could set lixee to level 0; shouldn’t I do that?
You should have this:
No, in itself in most dwellings there will be only one device at level 0. You could have, for example, 2 meters with a subscription, but that should be
Thank you for the confirmation
That’s true, and it’s noted in the doc
Hmm, okay, but I still don’t understand the logic of the “locking”. Because I had put my 30min consumptions of my outlets under the 30min consumption of the zlinky. But if I reread the doc, the 30min consumption of the outlets should be under the “energy consumed” of the outlet with the same name.
I even have a “cost” that is blocked. In short, I kinda messed up my hierarchy and I don’t feel like I can fix it :frowning
Originally the idea of the lock was precisely to prevent mistakes by preventing modifications of the « 30-minute consumption » and « 30-minute cost » features 
In theory, everything is handled by the integrations ^^
I think in your case,
Alright, one last update today
I’m releasing Gladys Assistant v4.66.6, which adds the ability to edit all features in the hierarchical view
@davidm50 You can update and that’ll be fine!