February 2026⊠on the scale of AI, that was 10 years ago
AI wasnât at all at the level it is today!
@Terdiousâs work was fine, that wasnât the issue. But the PR was huge, and no one could have seriously reviewed it. At the time, I wasnât absolutely certain that his PR didnât alter the consumption calculation code, which is quite complex. So I set it aside in favor of other projects that were more of a priority at the time.
Today, things have changed: with AI, we can absolutely pick up this development properly and integrate it into Gladys with confidence ![]()
However, itâs not part of the projects Iâve planned for my last days of work before the baby arrives
My year-end plan is detailed here: Gladys d'ici fin 2026 : une grande nouvelle et un plan ambitieux đ
Iâm happy to take a feature request if it doesnât already exist, and itâs a topic we can pick up again in 2027 when I return ![]()