The reason is quite clear: Wikipedia does not judge the notoriety of a project by its number of users or its website, but by the existence of independent, high-quality secondary sources focused on Gladys (articles that really talk about Gladys, not just a mention in a list). In short, at least two are needed, published at sufficiently spaced dates. In 2024, we didn’t have enough.
Source hunting: if you’ve come across an article, a feature in a magazine (print or web), a report, a segment in a podcast, or a video from a recognized media outlet that talks about Gladys, share the link here. Personal blogs and forums unfortunately don’t count, but don’t hesitate to post everything, we’ll sort it out.
Wikipedia contributors: if one of you has some experience with Wikipedia, it would be ideal for you to take on the project. The right approach would be to prepare a well-sourced draft, then request the restoration of the page by presenting the new sources.
On my side, as I am the creator of the project, I am in a conflict of interest and cannot write the article myself. But I can of course answer any factual questions (dates, history, figures).
The goal is not to rush, but to come back with a solid file this time